A few minutes later, Hans and his lawyers watched as Katherine Kesey, the person leading the opposition to Solstice’s patent filing, held a press conference. She began by saying that not only was Solstice’s patent application meritless, but that the company was morally bankrupt too.
“How could the folks at Solstice,” Katherine
began, “justify trying to claim intellectual property,
meaning the result of their own unique and novel work,
over a molecular structure of somamine that is so obviously
not theirs? It’s because they have to. They have no choice. If they
can’t create a monopoly, they will fail.”
“How could the folks at Solstice,” Katherine
began, “justify trying to claim intellectual property
meaning the result of their own unique and novel work,
over a molecular structure of somamine that is so obviously not theirs? It’s because they have to. They have no choice.
If they can’t create a monopoly, they will fail.”
“How could the folks
at Solstice,” Katherine
began, “justify trying to claim
intellectual property, meaning the
result of their own unique and novel work, over a molecular structure of somamine that is so obviously not theirs? It’s because they have to. They have no choice. If they can’t create a monopoly, they will fail.”
A few minutes later, Hans and his lawyers watched as Katherine Kesey, the person leading
the opposition to Solstice’s patent filing, held a
press conference. She
began by saying that
not only was Solstice’s
patent application
meritless, but that the
company was
morally
bankrupt
too.
“How could
the folks at Solstice,”
Katherine began, “justify
trying to claim intellectual
property, meaning the result
of their own unique and novel work, over a molecular structure of somamine that is so obviously not theirs? It’s because they have to. They have no choice. If they can’t create a monopoly, they will fail.”